BISMARCK HOTEL COMPANY v. TYRRELL, 318 Ill. App. 230 (1943)

47 N.E.2d 544

Bismarck Hotel Company, Appellee, v. John F. Tyrrell et al., defendants. John F. Higgins and Myer H. Gladstone, Appellants.

Gen. No. 42,274. (Abstract of Decision.)Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District.
Opinion filed March 22, 1943 Rehearing denied April 5, 1943

JUDGMENTS, § 376[*] — when objection that revived judgment was not in proper form is without merit. Objection that revived judgment by confession entered by court was not in proper form, in that it did not contain order that execution issue thereon, held without merit, in view of section 55 of Civil Practice Act and also in view of failure of defendants to make objection to form of judgment when it was entered (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, ch. 110, par. 179; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.055).

[*] See Callaghan’s Illinois Digest, same topic and sectionnumber.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. JOSEPH B. HERMES, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at June term, 1942.

Myer H. Gladstone and John F. Higgins, pro se;

Victor C. Winnen, for appellee.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE MATCHETT.

“Not to be published in full.” Opinion filed March 22, 1943; rehearing denied April 5, 1943.

Page 231