DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL, 159 Ill.2d 576 (1995)

Supreme Court of Illinois.
1995.

(78053) People v. Nanez Nos. 1-90-1863, 1-91-0171, filed 08/18/94 ………… Denied. (78219) People v. Nevarez Rule 23 Order No. 1-92-3270, filed 09/20/94 ………. Denied. (78169) People v. Ortiz Rule 23 Order No. 1-93-2262, filed 09/15/94 ………. Denied. (78293) People v. Parish Rule 23 Orders Nos. 2-92-1403, 2-93-0036, filed 11/10/94 ……………………………………… Denied. (78303) People v. Patton No. 5-91-0048, filed 09/14/93 …………………… Denied. (78106) People v. Petro Miscellaneous Order No. 4-94-0274, filed 10/06/94 ……………………………………… Denied. (78125) People v. Pontillo No. 2-92-1463, filed 09/29/94 …………………… Denied. (78163) People v. Pope Rule 23 Order No. 1-92-3714, filed 08/02/94 ………. Denied. (78255) People v. Post Miscellaneous Order No. 4-93-0574, filed 11/03/94 ……………………………………… Denied. (78173) People v. Purifoy Rule 23 Order No. 2-93-0198, filed 10/18/94 ………. Denied. (78261) People v. Quinlan Rule 23 Order No. 1-92-3973, filed 10/27/94 ………. Denied. (77999) People v. Ramos Rule 23 Order No. 1-93-0782, filed 09/30/94 ………. Allowed with order.

The order of December 6, 1994, denying the petition for leave to appeal (158 Ill.2d 562) is vacated. The petition for leave to appeal is allowed. In the exercise of this court’s supervisory authority, this cause is remanded to the circuit court of Cook County, with directions that the mittimus of defendant in People v. Ramos, No. AC1-93-0782 and No. TR92-CR-18648, show that defendant was not convicted of a Class X crime, with due notice to the Department of Corrections.

Page 577