Supreme Court of Illinois.
1983.
(59128) People v. Killen ……………………………………. Denied. (59422) People v. Lotts …………………………………….. Denied. (59301) People v. Lucien ……………………………………. Denied. (59397) People v. Martin ……………………………………. Denied. (59295) People v. McGinnis …………………………………. Allowed. (59438) People v. Miller, Gary L. ……………………………. Denied. (59292) People v. Minnis ……………………………………. Denied. (59349) People v. M.W.J. ……………………………………. Denied. (59300) People v. Pauley ……………………………………. Denied. (59289) People v. Pigue …………………………………….. Denied. (59313) People v. Plucinski …………………………………. Denied. (59473, 59480) People v. Pollution Control Board ……………… Allowed. (59440) People v. Poree …………………………………….. Denied. (59302) People v. Pughsley ………………………………….. Denied. (59419) People v. Rainer ……………………………………. Denied. (59105) People v. Randolph ………………………………….. Denied. (59271) People v. Raybon ……………………………………. Denied. (59402) People v. Rial ……………………………………… Denied. (59355) People v. Rivera ……………………………………. Denied. (59387) People v. Rizzio ……………………………………. Denied. (58927) People v. Ruiz ……………………………………… Denied. (59269) People v. Sampson …………………………………… Denied. (59252, 59332, 59333) People v. Sanders, James ………………… Denied. (59404) People v. Schemmel ………………………………….. Denied. (59483) People v. Sepulveda …………………………………. Denied. (59317) People v. Smith, Harold ……………………………… Denied. (59338) People v. Spiotto …………………………………… Denied. (59411) People v. Starks ……………………………………. Denied. (59281) People v. Strauser ………………………………….. Denied. (59405) People v. Strohl ……………………………………. Denied.
JUSTICE SIMON, dissenting:
I dissent here because the defendant’s appointed counsel had also previously represented one of the State’s important witnesses in a different case. Although the representation of the defendant and the witness may not have overlapped in time (the record is not clear on this point), the witness’ prior involvement with the law could and should have been used to impeach him. For that reason I think we should allow the
Page 571
defendant’s petition for leave to appeal in order to decide whether his attorney had either a per se or actual conflict of interest.
1 N.E.3d 641 (2013)2013 IL App (3d) 120518376 Ill. Dec. 929 Justin EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.…
June 1853 Illinois Supreme Court 14 Ill. 273 Horatio Newhall, Appellant, v. The Galena and…
2021 IL App (1st) 200200-U BRIAN MARLER, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. ZACHARY WULF and BOS GROUP, LLC,…
107 N.E.3d 338 (2018)424 Ill.Dec. 252018 IL App (3d) 170175 IN RE MARRIAGE OF Fanny…
145 N.E.3d 537 (2019)2019 IL App (2d) 180693438 Ill.Dec. 1 The PEOPLE of the State…
22 Ill. 9 Supreme Court of Illinois. MINERAL POINT RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v.…