THE PEOPLE v. EPPOLITO, 373 Ill. 114 (1940)

25 N.E.2d 509

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendant in Error, vs. MICHAEL EPPOLITO, Plaintiff in Error.

No. 25294. Judgment affirmed.Supreme Court of Illinois.
Opinion filed February 13, 1940.

WRIT OF ERROR to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. JAMES F. FARDY, Judge, presiding.

LEONARD STEIGER, for plaintiff in error.

JOHN E. CASSIDY, Attorney General, THOMAS J. COURTNEY, State’s Attorney, and A.B. DENNIS, (EDWARD E. WILSON, JOHN T. GALLAGHER, MELVIN S. REMBE, and BLAIR L. VARNES, of counsel,) for the People.

Page 115

Mr. JUSTICE SHAW delivered the opinion of the court:

Michael Eppolito and Nunzio Iocco, were jointly indicted in the criminal court of Cook county for burglary. They were tried by the court without a jury, were found guilty and sentenced to the penitentiary. Eppolito, alone, has sued out this writ of error to review the judgment.

The testimony of several witnesses shows that on January 15, 1939, about 4:30 P.M., a house on Marquette road in the city of Chicago was burglarized and ransacked. A neighbor who saw two men enter the house called the police and when they arrived the defendants were coming out of or near a gang-way leading from the rear of the building. Both defendants ran from the police but were captured, one of them, plaintiff in error, having run in the house and hidden under a bed. Each testified in his own behalf to the effect that they had driven to the burglarized house to see an uncle of Iocco, although no such uncle lived there, but that they did not commit the burglary. The record shows that each defendant previously had been convicted of felony.

The only argument presented in the briefs is that the evidence fails to prove the defendant Eppolito guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but this argument is based entirely on a supposition that the defendants told the truth. It is apparent from the finding and judgment that the trial court did not believe the defendants, and with this finding and judgment we will not interfere. People
v. Bolger, 359 Ill. 58.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Page 116

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

Newhall v. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad, 14 Ill. 273 (1853)

June 1853 Illinois Supreme Court 14 Ill. 273 Horatio Newhall, Appellant, v. The Galena and…

3 years ago

MARLER v. WULF, 2021 IL APP (1st) 200200-U (2021)

2021 IL App (1st) 200200-U BRIAN MARLER, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. ZACHARY WULF and BOS GROUP, LLC,…

3 years ago

IN RE MARRIAGE OF LEWIN, 107 N.E.3d 338 (Ill. App. 2018)

107 N.E.3d 338 (2018)424 Ill.Dec. 252018 IL App (3d) 170175 IN RE MARRIAGE OF Fanny…

3 years ago

PEOPLE v. CONROY, 145 N.E. 3d 537 (2019)

145 N.E.3d 537 (2019)2019 IL App (2d) 180693438 Ill.Dec. 1 The PEOPLE of the State…

4 years ago

MINERAL POINT RAILROAD COMPANY v. KEEP, 22 Ill. 9 (1859)

22 Ill. 9 Supreme Court of Illinois. MINERAL POINT RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v.…

5 years ago

PEOPLE v. EUBANKS, 2019 IL 123525 (2019)

2019 IL 123525 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. RALPH EUBANKS, Appellee.…

5 years ago